ALL POLITICAL SCIENCE MAJORS MUST COMPLETE SENIOR PROJECTS. While
our senior project (POSC 396) serves as a SAGES capstone, so will meet
that requirement, it has always been part of the major. Therefore, even
if you do a capstone in another major, you must do POSC 396.
The senior project is essentially an independent study, which must result
in a paper and a short presentation. Students should think about topics
that they would like to learn more about, and ask professors if they are
willing to supervise those topics. Once you find a supervisor for a topic,
you and the instructor must agree on a plan of work. This should include
at a minimum:
|
The topic
What written work will be required, by what dates
An overview of how you expect to research the topic.
|
Required project plan: This work plan should be written up as a
Senior
Project Prospectus. A hard copy of the prospectus must be filed with the
Political Science department office. Department rules as stated in the
General Bulletin say the prospectus should be filed with the department
office no later than the drop/add date of each semester (Friday of the
second week). The intent of this rule is to ensure that the prospectus is
filed in time for the student to register for the course. That means, no
instructor for a senior project should issue a permit for a student to
register for the project until the faculty member and student have drafted
the prospectus!
Each member of the faculty will have his or her own expectations of
projects. All will expect some significant writing. They are also expected
to require some delivery of work by the middle of the semester, and to
reflect any failure to deliver work in the midterm grade report. Beyond
those requirements, there are many forms of projects. Some will collect
and analyze primary data. Others will be literature reviews. Some faculty
members, such as myself, are willing to have a project in which the
student begins by learning about a subject more generally, prepares
reports on what they are learning, and then focuses in on a more precise
paper topic towards the midpoint of the term. Others expect a more precise
topic earlier. The most important things is to find a faculty member who
feels comfortable advising on a topic and grading a study about it, and
then to have a clear agreement about what you will be doing.
Oral presentations: As part of the requirements for a SAGES capstone, all
projects need to be presented in a public forum. The political science
department has been doing this in a format that somewhat resembles an
academic conference, though with more and better food than is normal for
political science conferences.
We have scheduled the presentations during the next-to-last week of each
semester. The session runs from about 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., with a break
for a buffet dinner in the middle. Refreshments are also available from
the beginning. Students are divided into panels based on their topics and
their supervisors. For example, in the Spring of 2009, we had seven
panels, with three or four students on each. Four of the panels started
around 5:00 p.m., and the other three around 7:00 p.m. Each student’s
section of the panel lasted between 15 and 20 minutes. Students took 8-10
minutes to report on their work, and the rest of the time was for
questions and comments from the audience.
This format is a version of what you would do at an academic conference.
Other members of the panel and the audience give feedback on the work. The
audience is not likely to be large, but the way we do this means that the
students who are speaking in the earlier or later panels are expected to
be there to listen to other students, and the department faculty is also
present. The presentations also are open to other students if they wish to
attend.
Students are not expected to have their final paper ready for
presentation. They are expected to have done enough to be able to give a
coherent and interesting talk. But one of the reasons for doing the
presentations during the next to last week of classes is, that gives
students time to think about comments made at the presentations when they
write their final papers. This is similar to how most conferences work. At
the American Political Science Association meeting, for example, most
participants are presenting papers that they hope to eventually submit to
journals, and they use the feedback to help them determine how to finalize
the paper for submission.
Finding a project supervisor: Students are responsible for finding a
supervisor for their topic. Your major advisor or the department chair
should be available to discuss your interests and suggest which of their
colleagues might fit those interests. Unless they are going to supervise
the project, however, they cannot issue the permit. Whoever issues the
permit has to do the grading, so only the actual supervisor can issue the
permit. Also, as explained above, the permit should not be issued until
the prospectus has been prepared.
Please note that there is no reason to feel you need the permit during the
usual preregistration period. POSC 396 cannot “fill.” You should not,
however, plan to show up during first week of a term and start looking for
a topic and advisor. So planning ahead is good, registering ahead is
unnecessary.
Occasionally a political science senior project is advised by a faculty
member from another department of the college or unit of the university.
This requires that the department chair approve so the department
administrators can arrange it with the registrar, and of course that the
faculty member be willing to do it. It almost always involves a student
who wants to study some aspect of the law, and a faculty member of the
School of Law.
The department is instituting a new policy about how many senior projects
can be supervised by any individual faculty member.
As of Fall of 2009, no member of the political science faculty may
supervise more than six senior projects during any term. There are two
reasons for this rule. First, if a member of the faculty supervises more
than six, s/he might not be able to attend all of their students’
presentations. This happened in the Spring of 2009, and is a bad idea.
Second, we want our faculty to be able to give enough attention to the
projects they are advising. We will be asking the registrar to put caps on
how many students can be registered for each of our faculty members’
versions of POSC 396, so that our professors cannot make exceptions.
No member of the faculty is required to supervise any particular topic or
student. The whole idea is to find good matches among students, faculty,
and topics. If a member of the faculty is uncomfortable with a topic, s/he
should not feel obligated to supervise, even for a student s/he knows
well. Similarly, if you have done work with some professor before that
does not mean you should feel you need to work with them on your senior
project. You should feel free to prospect.
Joe White
May 22, 2009
|